|
|||
How can we have a Mousepad Roundup without a Mouse Roundup? The top mouse companies have sent us their best and now it is time to determine a king of the hill. ![]() Last year we saw the emergence of laser precision in the mainstream mouse market via the Logitech MX1000, and the question on the minds of many was would it be as big of a need as it was made out to be. What laser technology needed to do was to have the same effect as optical did on the mechanical mice market; complete and utter destruction. However, it did not, and we are left teetering on the fence as to whether this is worth forking out another $30-$70 for the upgrade. I contacted Saitek, Microsoft, Razer, and Logitech to send me their best gaming mice in each technological category. Before I introduce our contestants, let me give you a run down on the history of each technology and what they bring to the table. A Bit of Mouse History Doug Engelbat was an electrical engineering graduate of UC Berkeley and is the father of the modern mouse. His goal was to create a device that was more natural to control and manipulate than a keyboard. During World War II, he received his inspiration from being a radar technician. During the war, he came in contact with many types of computer input devices that resembled the mouse as we know it. He was granted the opportunity to manifest his idea in 1959, and by 1968, he had succeeded. Engelbat and a group of computer scientists and electrical engineers presented their invention to the Fall Joint Computer Conference in San Francisco. It was a flop and did not catch on in the “mainstream” until the Apple Lisa in 1983. This of course evolved over the years and became the mouse as we know it today. Optical Mice Optical mice provided a far superior method of cursor manipulation compared to their predecessors. The major change it presented was the lack of mechanical parts. This meant no more cleaning the ball, dirt in the gears, or aging of the mechanical parts from stress. Optical engines enlisted the help of a red light emitting diode and a small camera to track the motion of the mouse. This new technology allowed the mouse to work on any non-reflective surface. It quickly caught on to power users and entered the mainstream market shortly thereafter. This was a revolution in the mouse world. Soon, more precise tracking engines and higher resolution imaging would allow faster movement speeds with greater accuracy. Laser Mice This past summer, Logitech announced the emergence of Laser technology in mice with their MX1000. I was one of the early adopters myself, curious to see what it had to offer. The Laser technology is yet another first in a long list of firsts that Logitech holds. In 1982, Logitech had the first commercially available mouse on the market. In 1984, they developed the first cordless mouse and the first cordless optical mouse in 2001. Finally, in the summer of 2005 they were the first to announce a mouse endowed with Laser technology. "We've turned off the red light on these optical mice and replaced it with an invisible laser that will change the industry," said David Henry, Logitech senior Vice President of the Control Devices Business Unit. "Laser will eventually make the optical mice of today obsolete. With laser technology, mice will see more microscopic detail. The nature of laser light gives mice the ability to track with amazing accuracy on more surfaces with more responsiveness than ever before." The laser tracking technology is the result of an alliance between Logitech, the world's No. 1 manufacturer of mice, and Agilent Technologies, the leader in mouse tracking technology. The nearly singular wavelength of laser light is capable of revealing much greater surface detail than the red light-emitting diode (LED) found in today's optical mice. In tests conducted at Agilent, the laser mouse was found to have 20 times more sensitivity to surface detail than LED optical mice. Hence, the laser can track reliably even on tricky polished or wood-grain surfaces. Back in June/July, Logitech ran a survey of more than 2,000 LED-based optical mice users; more than two-thirds of respondents were interested in the ability to use a mouse on more surfaces. Because of their ability to illuminate the surface in greater detail, laser mice will track on surfaces on which LED-based optical mice tend to falter. Twas’ the Paragraph Before the Review This is a two part review. First, we will review the optical mice and find the best of our optical contenders. Second, we will take a look at the laser mice and determine the best of our laser contenders. Finally, we will take a look at the best of each and determine the top mouse of them all! Doesn't that sound exciting? Each contender will be judged on 7 different qualities. These qualities are most important to gamers when looking for a new mouse. The scale will be 0-5; 0 = Terrible, 1 = Bad, 2 = Below average, 3 = Above average, 4 = Good and a 5 will be a perfect score.
Table of Contents Optical Mice Logitech MX518 Microsoft Comfort 3000 Razer Diamondback Saitek 1600dpi Desktop Gaming Mouse Optical Summary Laser Mice Razer Copperhead Logitech G5 Saitek Laser Mouse Microsoft Laser 6000 Laser Summary Conclusions |




User Comments
ROFL...
get the firmware fix there were some tracking problems with the first batches of the mice, but the new firmware for it (v1.1) fixes the tracking problems
i just went with an mx518 about a month ago and hopefully i'll never have to change mice again because I love this thing to death
it is definitely VERY annoying the bug on the G5. I bought a G5, installed the firmware and all, but it still wouldnt work :s
i tried it with my Fatpad and a steelpad 5L made for laser technology, and it still wouldnt work -_-
i exchanged it against a razer db plasma edition, i like it but it definitely needs some time getting used to, and the buttons are crap -_-
"The only thing that makes it imperfect is is the lack of a way to tell what level of sensitivity you are at while in game."
dunno what he set up wrong, but the sensitivity shows up in the bottom right of your screen IN GAME showing exactly where you change it to. Razer have been leading the technology race in gaming mice for a while now, and they're infinitely more comfortable to use, and I have massive hands (my fingers touch the mousepad over the front of the mouse when I grip a Logitech normally).
The Copperhead is a bit more comfortable (than the Diamondback) and the most precise mouse you can get right now (yes even more than the G5 if you bother to look at the specifics), but the change of putting the buttons below the side rail makes the two buttons on the right useless in game, which blows.
http://www.zipzoomfly.com/jsp/ProductDeta..
I know that its cordless and maybe thats why you didn't review it, but it is an amazing looking mouse
And i don't see whats wrong with the 518 gliders, mine have never shifted and i've had it for almost a year. (And i press pretty hard on my mouse sometimes)
I've also heard problems of g5 tracking on certain surfaces.
#28 i had a MX510 (same ergonomics than the MX518) and the gliders were one of the main reasons it made me change mice, cause they werent at all at the right place after a year or so of use (it lasted a year, its good imo)
Thats just my opinion. It would be cool to see reviews of older mice, but doing this review is great for the community. Good work.
#47, no 518 feels nearly identical to 510, g5 feels a little more grainy, but it only has 1 side button D=
I would've preferred another section in the reviews saying how well the mouses track considering a lot of people are commenting that the new MS Laser mouse can track for the life of it.
More Pages
Submit Comments
Registered Users Only
In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!