Sennheiser has sent us two of their high-end home entertainment headphones. These cans have been somewhat popular amongst gamers in recent years, and we aim to find out why.
When it comes to gaming, there are few things more important that the devices you use to actually make contact with the game. Devices like video displays, mice, mouse pads, and headphones are critical to maintain your play at its utmost potential. A good pair of headphones really goes a long way towards improving your game. They can help you position footsteps, hear even the most minor changes in sound, and receive information from your teammates with little distortion. Even on the non-gaming aspect of our computer lives, a good set of headphones goes a very long way. It makes listening to music more enjoyable, or watching a movie, for example. We’ve recently acquired a two pairs of headphones from Sennheiser for us to review, and these aren’t your typical PC-series headsets. These are the HD435 and HD555 headphones. They come with a hefty price tag, but are they worth it? Read on and find out.
Testing headphones is a tricky business. There is really no exact way to calculate how “good” they sound, so it's mostly subjective. We’ve tried to take as much guesswork out of the process as possible by assembling a list of criteria that we will specifically test these headphones with. Here’s what we came up with:
- Sound quality while playing games. Obviously, this is the most critical aspect of any gamer considering a new headset. We’ve tried to go into as much detail on this area as possible in order to bring you a good picture of it. Our gaming test involves ZeGermans going into a DoD 24/7 avalanche pub and playing until he gets banned. This process usually takes about 10 minutes.
- Sound quality while playing music. This ranks #2 among most gamers with regards to headphones. If the headphones can’t let you rock out to your favorite mp3’s while you’re pubbing, what’s the point? We’ve opted for a 320Kbps recording of Beethoven’s 9th symphony, listening to the 8-minute instrumental part of the Ode to Joy melody. The multitude of frequencies, countermelodies, and volumes make this stretch of music ideal.
- Sound quality while playing movies. There are quite a few gamers out there, myself included, that also store quite a few videos on their computer. Taking advantage of the massive amounts of storage space around today as well as the huge monitors most of us use, watching a movie the computer is more and more becoming an everyday thing. Therefore it warrants us taking a close look at the sound quality in this category. The sequences used to test this were from several fight scenes in the only movie we had on hand, Lord of the Rings: Return of the King.
- Comfort. Who cares how good the headset sounds if you can’t wear it on your head? Making a headset comfortable is important to any of us that sit in front of our computers for hours at a time. We had no exact way of testing this, so it’s purely dependant on ZeGermans' fat ears.
- Other bells and whistles. While this isn’t critical, it’s always nice when the manufacturer throws in some goodies to show their appreciation for you in purchasing their product.
User Comments
http://www.dansdata.com/bithead.htm
Most likely the reason why you wouldn't hear the bass on the 555's reviewed is that your soundcard simply couldn't power the headphone’s speakers enough to really drive the bass. A headphone amplifier can do that for you and more- I bet that you will be amazed with the difference, and see what these headphones are capable of.
The bithead is pricey though, but if you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up.
Sennheiser headphones are excellent quality, and worth every penny.
435 | 18-19,500 Hz
555 | 15-28,000 Hz
Now the average person just has to know is...The better range, the better quality you will get. Obviously the 555 has the better quality out of the two.
I have the 280pros, which cost only $99, but have a range of 8,000-25,000Hz. You can probably tell, the 280pro's sound better then the 555 :).
The 650's has everyone beat though... 10-39500 Hz
I'm just trying to show that by including the data, you can show technical proof for your review. It helps more then just, "They sound awesome." I'm not trying to be mean, but in a way I have to. You are using words such as flat, crisp, etc. What if you have bad ears? What if I have better ears? You see, you need to streamline the review so that it can apply to everyone. No two people have the same ears. I have very sensitive ears, and can hear a lot of things others probably cannot.
P.S. All those icemat/sennheiser gaming headphones are a waste of money. Listen to this guy, pick up the 555's or some 5xx series of headphones.
18,000 - 22,000
haha, nice article.
Very durable, great sound, and a long, thick cord.
#23 you know nothing about headphones..
#13 was very helpful. Although I think the sound of my Siberias are pretty good. Mic sucks however.
5H owns all
About the HD555. If you own a soundcard that isn't the X-fi or something equivalent or better, you're not going to hear the best of the 555. I own the audigy 2 zs and it simply doesn't push the headphones well enough. A lot of it has to do with the 120 Ohm input impedence on the 555s, but still...even if you own an x-fi, get a cmoy amplifier on ebay for $50 to go with your HD555. You'll realize that PC is pretty bad as a audio output source for headphones.
I don't like how the reviewer commented on the bass. Because of all things in a pair of headphones, that should be the least of your concerns. That's what EQ is for.
Audio Technica A900: (5 - 40,000Hz)
Sennheiser HD650: (10 - 39500Hz)
Does it mean A900 is better? NO. The HD650 is a tad better than the A900, and cost almost twice. Specs may be considered a technical proof as you said but it's by no means a way to judge headphones or any audio equipment. Plus everyone knows how to read specs, you can just go to their websites. I'd rather see reviews with personal opinions than reviews with technical terms and numbers.
I honestly don't think it's necessary to review Sennheiser HD595+ at this point, but instead do some reviews on other brands such as:
Beyerdynamic DT440
Shure E3c
Etymotic Research ER-6
Audio Technica A700/AD700
AKG K240/K271/K501
Good read anyway
#45 I know you shouldn't base your review off specs, but specs don't lie. A900's are some of the best headphones...I don't see where you are coming off as they are so much lower then the 650's.
Also, one big factor is the sound card. Onboard sound cards will always make your headphones seem bad, while a good $100+ might make even $10 ones sound good.
Don't want to hijack the review, but if you are seriously interested in quality headphones, I suggest checking out http://www.headphone.com/guide/by-budget/ . It has a very good overview of the headphones you should get, at which price range. And these won't break on you after two weeks ;)
What I would do for some AKG K 1000's....I have heard so many good things about them, it isn't fair :(
I personally own a pair of Audio Technica A900 because I consider them the best at their price range (<$200), but I've also tried my friend's HD650 (>$350), which is definitely better than my A900 (much clearer midrange and deeper base).
:-)
More Pages
Submit Comments
Registered Users Only
In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!