Monday November 23 2009
Story Header

FPSLabs Home: KillerNIC Review

By: Thomas Gribble - Published September 25, 2006 at 10:49 PM EDT - Writer Archive
Bigfoot's Killer has the coolest name of all NIC devices on the market, hands down. It also looks pretty cool too. But does it live up to the marketing hype? Or does it fall in-line with the criticism it has received all over the net?


In the past, upon hearing the word “Bigfoot”, the first thing that came to mind was a 9 foot tall bipedal primate that roams around in thick forests and preys on small children. That was until recently, when a company called Bigfoot Networks made their tumultuous entry into the hardware scene with the release of what they were calling the first and only network interface card designed for gamers. Initially, the community’s response to the announcement resembled that of a unanimous shrug, but eventually, enthusiasts took it a step further and began to criticize the legitimacy of the product altogether.

Packet shapers have existed for quite a while, and network interface cards that handle 100% of the network load have been available via various technologies for some time, as well. It thus made sense to think that this “KillerNIC” from Bigfoot Networks was 20% NIC, 80% gimmick. Perhaps a lot of this criticism was generated from the fact that the common networking load on the CPU usually hovers around 2-3%, and giving that 2-3% back to the processor by offloading it to a card does not really produce the kind of performance increase you could get from a video card or CPU upgrade; on the other hand, perhaps it was generated from the fact that nobody had really heard of Bigfoot Networks before.

In 2004, a gamer and electrical engineer-turned-businessman by the name of Harlan Beverly teamed up with two fellow University of Texas graduates to form Bigfoot Networks. The company’s original business plan won several prestigious awards, allowing the company to not only gain street credit, but also attract investors. Their very effective business plan, in tandem with Harlan Beverly’s network chip engineering experience - which includes the development of the world’s first 100% CPU off-load networking solution and involvement in the design of the Intel PRO 1000 chipset during his tenure at Intel Corp - suggested that this new company had loads of potential.

Their first commercial product, the Killer Network Interface Card (or KillerNIC as it has come to be known) has been the target of huge amounts of community attention, and today we will finally get a chance to see what this killer is made of.

Continued (1/10) »

User Comments

1
102% Ranking 102% Ranking 102% Ranking 102% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I would like to see this in a server for a major CPU test. The voice stuff seems very interesting I just wish the price was a bit lower. I wonder if you could install Open VPN on its linux OS?
Its a piece of cake to bake a pretty cake.
2
85% Ranking 85% Ranking 85% Ranking 85% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

The price is what gets me. Maybe by the 2nd generation it will be more mainstream after they sell some or something. As much as I would like to use one I just cant justify it in my rig, all my high end parts or not.

The performance is noticeable though which is more impressive than I thought it would be.
Senior Editor - http://www.fpslabs.com
3
5% Ranking 5% Ranking 5% Ranking 5% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

280$....that's really all I should have to say. You can buy 2 videocards with that much money, hell my whole setup cost 618$.
4
22% Ranking 22% Ranking 22% Ranking 22% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice review by the way..long and detailed :)

surprisingly every review in new egg is good. 13 out of 14 customers that swear by the card. I was expecting a lot of more "money wasted" bashing

This comment was edited at 09/26/2006 1:12 AM
5
7% Ranking 7% Ranking 7% Ranking 7% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

wow that was a long nice read nice man
6
30% Ranking 30% Ranking 30% Ranking 30% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

well since theres no competition, they CAN up the price.

if u want good stuff u gotta pay good money
ASROCK DUAL 939, ATHLON 3500+, 6800GS, 1GB CORSAIR, 160GB SATA2, XG VIPER
7
47% Ranking 47% Ranking 47% Ranking 47% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Good review. I knew this wasn't just a gimmick. :)
I bring the HEAT like Val Kilmer.
8
113% Ranking 113% Ranking 113% Ranking 113% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

excellent review

seriously even it does what it says, $280 is just too much
Inactive.
9
62% Ranking 62% Ranking 62% Ranking 62% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice review shoooooesy

but i cant see anyone paying almost 300 bucks for like...5 more fps and 2 ms ping difference

that is unless ur one of those teams that can't field five and want to use their increasing ping feature to postpone matches :X
GotFrag CoD and Features Head
10
1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

First of all, it makes a LOT more of a difference than one might think. I have seen some drastic improvements. You really cannot fathom the difference until you try one.

And as far as that price goes... lets see here.... I think I have a bit of an answer to that too.

Newegg.com is running a promotion on it. $30 off if you have the magic word.
And I happen to know that magic word. BUYKILLER

Use BUYKILLER.
Just don't tell them you got it from me.
11
28% Ranking 28% Ranking 28% Ranking 28% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#10 blatant ad spamming :)
12
19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking 19% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

hah, 280 bucks for that thing? Im not willing to shift out that much money for 2ms, i wouldnt even be able to tell the difference. Maybe when some future generations of this card will come out and show some drastic improvements then i would buy it. Right now that card is just a baby waiting to grow up.
13
9% Ranking 9% Ranking 9% Ranking 9% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Put the K in The Dre Are you Stayin wit meh?
14
62% Ranking 62% Ranking 62% Ranking 62% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

rip off
#.eP :: extreme Perfection :: cal-main ::

I wont buy anything like that until the price comes wayyyyyy down...
16
10% Ranking 10% Ranking 10% Ranking 10% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

that card is just a joke. Today every motherboard got 1 gigabit cards onboard. there is absolutely no need to buy this kind of crap. Even if the price would be 50$ or lower, the card isn't worth it.

Giving that card an Editors Choice Award makes no sense. GotFrag maybe got some $$$ behind the scenes to release that positive feedback. That was ridiculous. The whole conclusion was a big advert.

For me, GotFrag lost something in that review.
17
20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking 20% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Let's say the card is worth it, unlike everyone seems to be saying.

I have a Buffalo TurboG router between me and my cable connection. Would installing this card in my PC still make a difference? Or would the performance lost at the router make it useless?
#PSYC
18
67% Ranking 67% Ranking 67% Ranking 67% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

it has some decent reviews on newegg...
if the price ever goes down (by alot) i may pick one up for kicks and giggles
[b]#PunkPino #Ska #g-shovel[/b]
19
94% Ranking 94% Ranking 94% Ranking 94% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

16, did you not pay attention to pages 2-5? It's so far beyond the integrated ethernets that it's not even funny. Not all network jacks are equal.
20
117% Ranking 117% Ranking 117% Ranking 117% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

if only i had 280 to drop :(
21
124% Ranking 124% Ranking 124% Ranking 124% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

While I'm surprised it wasn't completely a hoax, the cost doesn't justify the means in my eyes. Perhaps over time while they mature more and start to be able to add more features, it could be a choice, but $280 for a < 10% increase in FPS in games when I already get great FPS, and < 3ms drop for latency is rather ridiculous. Seems like it could be a solid product in the future, but not right now.
22
50% Ranking 50% Ranking 50% Ranking 50% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I still believe its a waste of money.
#e0s CEVO-MAIN
23
17% Ranking 17% Ranking 17% Ranking 17% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

A new $300 video card or processor (or even adding some RAM) would probably help your performance more than that NIC unless you've already maxed those things out. My NIC would be the last thing I would try to squeeze the last drop of performance out of. However, if you've already got the best of the best of everything else in your system and have money left over to spend, I could see where this may be attractive.
24
17% Ranking 17% Ranking 17% Ranking 17% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

hopefully someone else jumps on the idea and the competition brings the prices way down

for $100 it might be worth it, but $280 is rediculous, no reason to buy it at that price unless you have more money than you know what to do with.
My fake plants died because I did not pretend to water them.
25
67% Ranking 67% Ranking 67% Ranking 67% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

seems alittle expensive for something with minor improvements.
David Marquez | Art Director | www.GotFrag.com | #gotfrag
26
111% Ranking 111% Ranking 111% Ranking 111% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

The price is what really ruins it all.
I play CS on a toaster
27
13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking 13% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

best thing about it is that it allows you to raise your ping so that you dont get used to that awesome 2ping reducion that this thing gives you. and the fact that you can run a vent server on it.... as if that server eats up that many resourses.

I'm really stuck here, should i buy a core 2 duo or this network card, i don't seem to figure out witch one would give me a bigger performance gain, i mean this card can lower your ping by 2ms, can you belive that?

maibe its an editors choise but it won't become a buyers choise, EVER and that is what really counts, no?

This comment was edited at 09/26/2006 2:11 PM
28
6% Ranking 6% Ranking 6% Ranking 6% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Great review - good work.
VIVA ESPANIA
29
99% Ranking 99% Ranking 99% Ranking 99% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

If you're able to pay $300 for a NIC card, how could your FPS be low enough to need it? The latency lowering would be cool if it was effective, but as far as I know it's impossible to do more than just minor tweaks because it really comes down to the data path between your computer and the server :/
30
15% Ranking 15% Ranking 15% Ranking 15% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

There may only be a small improvement in the test environment they set up, but i am sure that it would be a much bigger improvement on a system with a lesser processor, ram, and video card. With that said though, the money would probably be better spent upgrading those components first.
error!
31
84% Ranking 84% Ranking 84% Ranking 84% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#16,

"GotFrag maybe got some $$$ behind the scenes to release that positive feedback."

I can assure you that we don't take money to sweeten our product reviews. What you're reading is the thoughts of our hardware team, which is a few thousand miles and a brick wall away from our sales team. We go out of the way to keep these things impartial.

Agree with #30, it doesn't strike me as apractical upgrade dollar-for-dollar, but uber-geeks and uber-gamers might get extra bragging rights and a few FPS out of their high-end rig with it.

This comment was edited at 09/26/2006 3:41 PM
32
25% Ranking 25% Ranking 25% Ranking 25% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

1, anything over $100 for a NIC is overkill
2, a NIC will never lower your ping by a lot, since ping isn't a clientside problem, it's the overall network infrastructure that's beyond your or Bigfoot networks reach. The only way to bring down ping is if all the major ISP companies do something about their internet infrastructure, wich will not happen any time soon, so yes this IS a waste of money
33
58% Ranking 58% Ranking 58% Ranking 58% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

if it was 50$ every gamer in the world would buy one...

i'm sure they will notice that soon enough.. but until it gets around that price tag the 2ms difference and more stable ping isn't exactly worth it IMHO
-
34
22% Ranking 22% Ranking 22% Ranking 22% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Obviously #10 works for the damn company that made this...

I wonder how many of the new egg reviews for the card are false creations from people like him that post spam to buy their product
35
8% Ranking 8% Ranking 8% Ranking 8% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

280$? ..
The paradise
36
66% Ranking 66% Ranking 66% Ranking 66% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

nice read
lawl
37
23% Ranking 23% Ranking 23% Ranking 23% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

$280 for 2ms ping... and that nets it an editors choice? Are you kidding me? I mean I enjoy the hardware reviews, but seriously, some of the ratings are braindead.
mmK
38
59% Ranking 59% Ranking 59% Ranking 59% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

2.80$ and I'll consider it

no thanks
id rather buy 5 pairs of expensive jeans then that

haha #10

First of all, it makes a LOT more of a difference than one might think. I have seen some drastic improvements. You really cannot fathom the difference until you try one.

Use BUYKILLER.
Just don't tell them you got it from me.








Joined Sep 2006, 1 Posts

thanks no thanks.

This comment was edited at 09/26/2006 6:52 PM
40
1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#37, I think if it does everything it says it does then it is probably better than any other NIC out there. Seems like "Editor's Choice" would be appropriate for this, no?
41
69% Ranking 69% Ranking 69% Ranking 69% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

Our editor's choice is given based on what we feel is the best product in a particular category. True- some of our editor's choice awards have been given to products based on their affordability and performance. However, if we jump to the ultra-high end, we can give editor's choice awards to the very best things available. There is no other NIC card on the market that offers the features that the KillerNIC does. While we do indeed feel that the price is quite high, and we would probably not buy this card if we were putting together a mid-range gaming PC, there is no doubt that this card is a must-have for gamers assembling a top-of-the-line machine.

If we had the money and option to get any NIC card we wanted, this is the one we would get, no question.
FPSLabs - Managing Editor - http://www.fpslabs.com - #fpslabs @ gamesurge
42
14% Ranking 14% Ranking 14% Ranking 14% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

I think they should have marketed this to game server operators instead of gamers. Just think of your favorite servers having this awesome NIC. THAT might help out lag spikes. Having this on the client side, thought, isn't going to make very much difference unless all the clients have it. imo

This comment was edited at 09/26/2006 7:31 PM
xfire username: werdwerdus
43
137% Ranking 137% Ranking 137% Ranking 137% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

"Here you can see that our ping was reduced by 7.5% (.8ms) when playing in the Los Angeles server, and by 3.5% (2.2ms) when playing in the Chicago server."

OH BOY! This definitely justifies the price! And that 5 fps increase in Source is just magnificent!
TRANCEaddict ♪~( ̄。 ̄) nemo me impune lacessit #925ballaz
44
34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking 34% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

the K on the card looks sexxxy
Asus A8N-SLi Prem AMD64 4000+ CorsairXMS2Gb WD250gb eVGA7800GT Audigy2SE
45
64% Ranking 64% Ranking 64% Ranking 64% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

No offence but for 280 dollars you could do these things which would help your ping and latency more.

1. Get a new modem $50tops (free from most isps if u trade in ur old one, and also this would stop ping spiking way more)
2. Get your lines inspected (free from most isp)
3. Get a better router $100tops (if you have one)
4. Get better eternet cable $20tops (wont really make an improvement)
5. Get better isp service eg. fios or a upgraded service $20/month tops (biggest improvement)

This comment was edited at 09/26/2006 8:19 PM
46
27% Ranking 27% Ranking 27% Ranking 27% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

All you have to look at are the graphs to notice this thing isnt worth more than $20.
help me!
47
1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking 1% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

One thing that the review should have included is the following:

Let's say you are building a new system using an Intel Core 2 E6600 which runs at 2.4Ghz and sells for about $320. What would happen to the performance if instead of spending ~$280 on the killer card, you buy the E6700 for just an extra $204 which runs at 2.66Mhz (This is not even thiking about over clocking). Would the extra 266Mhz of the E6700 have the same, worst, better results as buying the NIC. If it is indeed better or the same, I would rather put the money on the faster CPU than in the killer NIC. It would be interesting if this comparisson could be made. I find it hard to justify spending ~280 on a NIC.
48
52% Ranking 52% Ranking 52% Ranking 52% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

verizon fios is our only hope
MoB Gaming Organization Team Member
49
69% Ranking 69% Ranking 69% Ranking 69% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

#47, the performance increase from an upgrade to an E6700 is undoubtedly better than the performance increase we saw with this card in the FPS department. However, a Core 2 Duo will not give you better ping times...

We really only recommend this card under two circumstances:
1. All other upgrade paths that could yield better results are unavailable for whatever reason.
2. You are looking for the absolute best parts to put in your gaming PC regardless of cost.

This comment was edited at 09/27/2006 5:21 PM
FPSLabs - Managing Editor - http://www.fpslabs.com - #fpslabs @ gamesurge
50
124% Ranking 124% Ranking 124% Ranking 124% Ranking
0 Frags
+   -

$280... No thanks.

More Pages

Submit Comments

Registered Users Only

In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!

Latest Poll