|
|||
The next generation in graphics technology has arrived. Does it deliver the performance you would expect from a next gen part? Read on to find out. ![]() It’s this vicious cycle in the hardware world. You buy something that is the top of the line for a hefty chunk of change, only to have something better, often times MUCH better come out just two or three months later. And, despite what we would like to think, there are plenty of those among us that take the bait time and time again. Why in the world of hardware do people more commonly go for the top of the line products than in most other market sectors? Perhaps it is the (relatively) inexpensive nature of computer parts. Perhaps it is because the high-end market, at its core, is driven by gamers who are always searching for the bleeding edge. Whatever the reason, it happens, and it happens a lot. A few months ago gamers were eating up a top of the line video card called the GeForce 7950GX2. Produced by one of the staple names in the gaming scene, NVIDIA, the card, or cards as it were, boasted not one but TWO GPUs that offered the very best performance money could buy. Sure there were less expensive solutions out there that could muster performance in the same ballpark, but there can only be one “absolute best”, and the 7950GX2 was it. After reaching into their pockets and coming up considerably short of the $600 required to own one of these behemoths, gamers across the world ended up falling for one of the less expensive options, they had little choice. Priced at right around $300, NVIDIA’s GeForce 7900GT offered far more than half the performance of the 7950GX2 at half the price. What a great deal. Well, WE jumped on it at least. So it is with heavy hearts that we announce to you today that there is a new monster out there: a video card that, without breaking a sweat, outperforms our trusty 7900GT by a factor of two. It is extremely rare in the hardware world that we see a product released that can ravage its predecessor two times over. As luck would have it however, it has happened twice this year. NVIDIA’s new GeForce 8800GTX, the incarnation of that “G80” core we have been hearing so much about, is that new card. And today, we take it for a spin. |




User Comments
=)
589 bucks for a card that will retail 25%more in europe. Boy, I can't wait. . *irony
And yeah #13, that would be sweet :)
And why the hell do you mention Vista? Just because it is DirectX 10 ready doesn't mean you need to buy Vista. Come on and use your brains. By your amazing logic, why buy a computer at all? Certainly all the costs with purchasing, maintenance and upgrading every 6 months far outweigh the benefits.
"Sigh. Don’t you just hate it when you come home after buying the biggest and best thing available, only to find your highly competitive neighbor proudly yielding"
yielding should be wielding, looks bad to have that in the first sentence of a 10 pager :), otherwise good job.
#9 stifle yourself, of course upgrading to a better processor will give you better performance increases than simply upgrading your GPU. however if you already have a core2 or top-of-the-line AMD and are running a 79xx or 19xx series card, you are looking at anywhere from %50-%150 performance increases from your current setup simply by upgrading to the 8800GTX.
#12 the 8800GTX consumers roughly the same amount of power as it's predecessors and ATi opponents. read this: http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?new..
"[i]Power consumption was measured using a Kill-A-Watt power meter that measures a power supply’s power draw directly from the wall outlet. The power supply used in the test system is a Thermaltake Toughpower that carries an efficiency rating up to 85%.
DailyTech previously reported NVIDIA recommends a 450-watt power supply for a single GeForce 8800GTX graphics card. This isn’t too farfetched of a recommendation. Power consumption of NVIDIA’s GeForce 8800GTX isn’t as bad as expected. [b]When compared to AMD’s current flagship ATI Radeon X1950 XTX, the GeForce 8800GTX only consumes 24% more power at idle. The power consumption differences under load decreases to around 4%.[/b] Considering the performance differences, the GeForce 8800GTX is no worse than AMD’s ATI Radeon X1950 XTX in terms of performance-per-watt.[/i]"
also in that same dailytech article is a benchmark comparison between the 8800GTX and ATi's X1950XTX where the G80 boasted %50-%90 performace increases during gameplay.
1) The 8800GTX is supposed to have an MSRP of $599 not $549, with the 8800GTS at $499. A $50 price gap isn't big enough for the performance gain.
2) How the hell are you getting 75.5fps on a single 7900GT in TES4: Oblivion on max details (even with AA off)? Are you staring at a wall in a dungeon hallway? With everything maxed (AA off) an 8800GTX in other benchmarks is nowhere near 100fps walking through the forrest/oblivion gates at 1280 or 1600. A 7900GT with everything maxed would struggle to get 20-25fps in intense scenes.
Also there are some benches with SLI and even a pic where the 8800gtx dwarfs a 7950gx2.
this card should blow oblivion away.. i hope
#19 ocuk are saying minimum 500w psu and recommending 600w+ http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/88..
this is nice too 23k in 3dmark 06 http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showt..
also splinter cell double agent just came out today as well, dunno if u wanna do anything with that :]
but great review none the less and for anyone on here that doesnt know pls refer to the end of post #32 for kingpins AMAZING results with 2 of these cards and the 680i chipset
absolutely incorrect.. unless 50%-150% performance increases don't mean anything to you. also, last time i checked, ocuk doesn't manufacture the G80 chipset, nVidia does.
#35 check the dailytech article i linked to in #19 for ATi comparisons.
I have been so tempted to step up to a 8800GTX with my 7950GT but it prolly doesn't make a lot of
sense with a x1950xtx also. Taken a lot of will power to not get in the queue to step up. Guess my 7950gt will be going up for sale.
which is about what my whole system cost me :|
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp..
That would be water cooling in all its glory.
This card is good if you want to use resolutions above 1900x1200 and have 4xAA turned on (look at anandtech's benchmarks for this). Otherwise, it's not worth the price.
#32 HOLY S***:
NVIDIA 680i SLI motherboard
Kentsfield b3/Conroe b1 @1.75v actual vcore/-100c loaded temps.
2 x 8800gtx SLI -40c to -45c approx 850-870/1150 Tek-9 ln2
CORSAIR DOMINATOR 8888 2gb
1 SILVERSTONE ZEUS 850W PSU 12v stayed at 12.3v load through all benches with max clocks.
^^^ from the guy in the second link
23,000 on 3dmark06
30,000 on 3dmark05
75,000 on 3dmark03
92,000 on 3dmark2001
afaik graphic cards are the main fps-limiting factor in most of the cases. the 8800gtx obviously pushes the limit a lot further.
i myself own a pretty old athlon64 3500+, and my geforce 6800gt broke a week ago. buying the msi 7900gto got me from playing oblivion in medium details and 1024x768 with a lot of choking to playing it in 1280X1024 with high details and only a little chocking. putting a 8800gtx in will probably make even my pc capable of playing oblivion in 1600x1200 with all the details put to the maximum and no choking at all.
as long as your monitor is capable of displaying high resolutions and as long as you don't just play cs you gotta love these cards imo.
http://overclockers.com/articles1375/
More Pages
Submit Comments
Registered Users Only
In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!