|
|||
Microsoft's first real entry into the competitive arena of gaming mice. Does the Habu have what it takes to compete against the crowd favorites? ![]() Category: Gaming Mouse Manufacturer: Microsoft Product: Habu™ Laser Gaming Mouse Gallery: Click Here Price: $51.99 It is a product of the collaboration between two companies that finds itself on our workbench today. In 2003, Microsoft launched their IntelliMouse Explorer 3.0. Although the IME3.0 was not developed as a gaming mouse, nor targeted towards gamers, the gaming community was quick to adopt it for its reliability, solid performance, and perhaps most of all, its comfort. Since then Microsoft’s Hardware division has admittedly been out of the gaming scene. While their aging products still attracted the die-hard IntelliMouse-using gamers, companies like Logitech and Razer were releasing mice that were, technically at least, far superior. This is why sometime in either late 2005 or 2006 a representative from Microsoft Hardware contacted the president of Razer, Robert Krakoff, about the possibility of teaming up to release a revolutionary product. To be called the Habu, this new mouse would incorporate design elements from Microsoft and technology from Razer, in addition to some never-before-seen features. When it hit the shelves in early November 2006, gamers were instantly reminded of the classic IME3.0 shape underneath the curvaceous Razer exterior. Initial reviews were mixed; the Habu seemed to suffer from the same skipping problems that countless gamers had been experiencing with Logitech’s G5 and Razer’s own Copperhead laser mice. It being February of the next year already, we have certainly had some time to develop our own opinions of the Habu. |




User Comments
Good review, 2 many lights for me. I could never own another laser mouse again.
With the Habu shape and less relaxed fingers and with the 800DPI that I love so much i'm thinking og buying it.
Although I am worried about the skipping problem, do you think that at a sensitivity of 1.6 in CS1.6 at 800DPI this will make it difficult for me? I am mostly a reflex player and occasionally a AWP whore.
but i dont like Microsoft mouse ..
actually i'm a steelseries fan, i want an IO 1.1 steel-mod,haha
Ehm, the best selling gaming mouse ever came before that one I think.
Considering Shoes uses a MSI 3.0 as his day to day mouse I think that qualifies him to make a pretty accurate comparison between it and the Habu.
Thus giving more credibility to his rating then you may think.
But better than most, at least there's some honesty in here. 7.9 with skipping problems? What does the product have to inflict physical pain upon you for you to score it an average 5 or lower?
The skipping problems only occur under specific settings (highest dpi and lowest sensitivity). At all other settings the mouse performs just fine. To give the mouse a bad rating because 1/20 people that use it MIGHT have skipping problems does not seem fair to me. We will, if things go my way of course, be dropping the numerical rating system entirely in the near future to avoid such disputes!
#13, the IME3.0 was not marketed as a gaming mouse. Habu is the first microsoft mouse to be marketed directly at gamers.
To me the ergonomics play the biggest role and of course the mouse has to work without doing any odd things - such as skipping or random fallouts and the MSI 3.0 / 4.0 has done me pretty good at handling that task so far, whereas I've always got the impression that razer mice ergonomics have been totally insane which is why I never bought one - oh yeah, and the insane price also plays a role :P
I was gonna get another, but instead I'll probably end up purchasing something else with my rebate. Laser technology = bad for high sensitivity players like myself.
Submit Comments
Registered Users Only
In order to post comments, you must be a registered member. If you have not registered, it's free and easy!