|
|||
Exciting times ahead on the CPU front of the hardware world with Intel's Penryn on the horizon later this year. And what's this later next year? An on-die memory controller? Read on for the scoop... Via Intel Press Conference: Today Intel previewed their roadmap for the next two generations of CPU’s to the press. First up is Penryn. Penryn is expected later this year in the 3rd or 4th quarter. This is a 45nm chip and is a little more than just a die shrink from the current Core 2 Duo chips. New features implemented with Penryn include:
It is becoming clear that Intel is no longer resting on their laurels much like they did with the Netburst architecture. Also mentioned were the 32nm die shrink in ’09 with Westmere and the next engineering change after that, Gesher, which will also be 32nm and is projected for 2010. With a microarchitecture change every two years they are planning to stay competitive with anything their rivals have to offer. Penryn of course is on the forefront with its release later this year. With the Intel Core chips already dominating the marketplace and Penryn ready sooner than originally expected, we have to ask: Will AMD be up to the challenge? Their Barcelona chips will have to be solid performers considering Intel’s already sizable lead. It’s also interesting to note Nehalem’s integrated memory controller, a feature that had given AMD’s CPU’s an edge for some time before the ICM chips from Intel arrived. Intel noted in the past how beneficial AMD’s on chip memory controller was and they have since engineered one into their own CPU dies. In a Q&A session during the press conference with Pat Gelsinger of Intel's Digital Enterprise Group, it was asked whether Intel was taking a page out of AMD's book with this new memory controller. In response to this question, Mr. Gelsinger said that the move is more of a natural progression towards less sockets on the motherboard. Will Intel pull off the on-die memory controller as well as AMD did allowing for super low latencies? Stay tuned to GotFrag as we continue to give you up-to-date coverage and hopefully some reviews later down the road when these processors come to market. |



User Comments
- 9 Comments» This story has had 9 comments posted since March 28, 2007 at 7:38 PM EST.